UQESH® Bio-Based Polyurethane Coating

Technical Comparison

Polyurethane Flooring vs Epoxy Flooring – What's the Difference?

Both polyurethane and epoxy are used as industrial floor coatings, but they differ in several critical respects – environmental impact, flexural strength, resistance to wear and impact, and resistance to ground moisture. Here we walk through the differences based on real test data, including full-scale wear and impact tests.

Quick Overview

Polyurethane vs Epoxy Flooring at a Glance

PropertyEpoxy FlooringUQESH Polyurethane Flooring
VOC Content60–600+ g/L depending on type2–10 g/L
OdourOften strong odour during applicationOdourless
Temperature ResistanceOften softens at just 50–60°CWithstands high-temperature steam cleaning
Chemical ResistanceVaries between typesExcellent resistance to acids, oils and solvents
Impact ResistanceCan crack under heavy impactMinimal marking, retained structure
Slip ResistanceLimited selectionFull range R9–R13
Raw MaterialPetroleum-basedRenewable castor oil

In Detail

Why More People Choose Polyurethane Over Epoxy

Lower VOC and Environmental Impact

Traditional epoxy can contain organic solvents and often has a high VOC content – from 60–80 g/L for solvent-free variants up to 500–600+ g/L for solvent-based ones, often with a noticeable odour during application. UQESH's waterborne polyurethane system uses water as the dispersion medium instead of solvents, giving ultra-low VOC levels of 2–10 g/L and a completely odourless result. The binder is also based on renewable castor oil instead of petroleum-based raw materials.

Better Temperature and Steam Resistance

Epoxy systems often soften at just 50–60°C and lack resistance to high temperatures or steam. UQESH uses a unique castor-oil polyol that exceeds the temperature resistance of traditional binders, making the system suitable for environments with daily high-temperature steam cleaning – such as commercial kitchens and food production.

Chemical Resistance

UQESH's waterborne polyurethane resists erosion from most chemicals, with particularly good resistance to acetic acid, lactic acid, oleic acid, citric acid and other substances commonly found in the food industry. Read more about the full test results on our Why UQESH page.

Background

Where Is Epoxy Used – and Why Did It Become the Standard?

Epoxy is used across five major areas: industrial coatings (for example anti-corrosion coatings on bridges and other equipment), building floors in factories and other facilities, electronics and electrical engineering (including circuit boards), composite materials combined with fibre (for example in aircraft manufacturing), and as adhesives and binders.

Epoxy became the go-to choice for industrial flooring for a long time, for a few simple reasons: relatively low cost, a well-established and widely understood application process, a glossy, presentable surface, and basic protection against dust and moisture.

Limitations

Epoxy's Limitations in Demanding Environments

At the same time, epoxy's limitations become increasingly apparent in tougher environments: outdoors it yellows and chalks easily, the material is brittle and cracks or delaminates relatively easily, it doesn't tolerate ground moisture particularly well, it softens at high temperatures and becomes brittle at low ones, and the vast majority of epoxy systems are solvent-based with high VOC emissions.

Flexural Strength

Epoxy vs UQESH Polyurethane – Flexural Strength

In a three-point bend test – where the test specimen is loaded symmetrically from three points until the breaking load is measured – UQESH's waterborne polyurethane achieves a flexural strength above 15 MPa with high toughness and low cracking tendency. Traditional epoxy achieves only around 6 MPa in the same type of test, with poorer toughness and a significantly higher risk of cracking.

Three-point bend test, test setup
Three-point bend test – test method
UQESH test specimen in bend test, not cracked
UQESH: > 15 MPa, not cracked
Epoxy test specimen cracked in bend test
Epoxy: ≈ 6 MPa, cracked

Ground Moisture

Epoxy vs UQESH Polyurethane – Resistance to Ground Moisture

UQESH's waterborne polyurethane system has a bond strength to concrete exceeding 2.0 MPa – higher than the concrete substrate's own strength – compared with typical epoxy, which often falls below 1.0 MPa with failure at the interlayer boundary. The higher bond strength means the system better withstands ground moisture that would otherwise rise from below, while epoxy's higher stiffness and poorer toughness make it more susceptible to the compressive stresses that cause blistering and delamination once moisture does get in. See the full bond-strength data on our Why UQESH page.

UQESH bond-strength test, 2.261 MPa, failure in the concrete
UQESH: 2.261 MPa, failure in the concrete
Epoxy bond-strength test, 0.373 and 0.415 MPa
Epoxy: 0.373 / 0.415 MPa
Epoxy floor blistering due to ground moisture
Epoxy: blistering caused by ground moisture

Wear Test

Epoxy vs UQESH Polyurethane – Wear Under Heavy Forklift Traffic

UQESH's waterborne polyurethane system has a segmented structure of hard and soft blocks, giving high hardness combined with high toughness and good elasticity – properties that help the system better withstand sliding motion and impact wear by spreading, absorbing and releasing the load energy.

The test was run with a 3-tonne electric forklift, one lap every 1.5 minutes, 10 hours of operation per day over 80 days – a total of 32,000 passes. Conclusion: the wear resistance of the two-component polyurethane system (UQESH) is significantly higher than that of epoxy.

Epoxy flooring: visible wear track after repeated wheel loading
Epoxy: clearly abraded wear track
UQESH polyurethane flooring: minimal wear track after repeated wheel loading
UQESH polyurethane: minimal wear track, surface otherwise intact

Impact Test

Epoxy vs UQESH Polyurethane – Impact Resistance

In a drop test with a 1 kg steel ball, on a concrete substrate meeting the test conditions, UQESH's system (PF 1.5 mm + TAP 750) withstood 70 drops from 1 metre and 10 drops from 2 metres without a single crack or sign of damage. A commonly used epoxy system on the market cracks and sustains damage after just 3 drops from 1 metre, and after only 1 drop from 2 metres.

Epoxy flooring: cracking after steel-ball drop test
Typical epoxy system: cracks after just 3 drops from 1 m
UQESH polyurethane flooring: no damage after steel-ball drop test
UQESH polyurethane: 70 drops from 1 m / 10 drops from 2 m, no damage

Source

Full Test Report

The tests above are compiled from UQESH's internal product testing. A summary document with all measurements and test results is available to download here:

FAQ

Polyurethane Flooring vs Epoxy Flooring – FAQ

What is the difference between polyurethane flooring and epoxy flooring?

They differ mainly in VOC content, odour and temperature resistance. UQESH's waterborne polyurethane system has significantly lower VOC content (2–10 g/L compared to 60–600+ g/L for epoxy), is odourless and withstands higher temperatures and steam environments better than traditional epoxy.

Is polyurethane flooring more environmentally friendly than epoxy flooring?

Yes. UQESH's system uses water as the dispersion medium instead of organic solvents, giving ultra-low VOC emissions. The binder is also based on renewable castor oil instead of petroleum-based raw materials.

Does polyurethane flooring withstand high temperatures better than epoxy?

Yes. Epoxy systems often soften at just 50–60°C. UQESH's castor-oil-based polyurethane is specifically engineered to withstand environments with high-temperature steam cleaning, such as commercial kitchens and food production.

Is polyurethane flooring more impact-resistant than epoxy?

Yes. In drop tests with a 1 kg steel ball, UQESH's system withstood 70 drops from 1 metre and 10 drops from 2 metres without damage, while a typical epoxy system cracks after just 3 drops from 1 metre and 1 drop from 2 metres.

Does polyurethane flooring hold up better than epoxy under heavy forklift traffic?

Yes. In an 80-day wear test with a 3-tonne electric forklift (32,000 passes in total), UQESH's two-component polyurethane system showed significantly higher wear resistance than epoxy.

Want to See Full Test Data or Find the Right System?

Explore deeper comparisons and test results, or find the UQESH system that fits your project.